Twitter blocking

I won’t be using The Official Wings Over Scotland Universal Twitter Enhancer. Not only because I instinctively recoil from the idea of allowing someone else to make prescriptive judgements on my behalf. There is an inherent contradiction in claiming to be able to think for oneself while delegating to some external agency the task of assessing the worth of even something so trivial as a Twitter comment – or the individual making it.

On a more practical note, while I fully concur with Stu Campbell’s conclusion that there are some (many?) unionists with whom it is totally pointless to engage, I take the view that limited exchanges with even the worst of British nationalist ‘zoomers’ can serve a useful purpose. I believe it is right that the distortions and lies promulgated by these bigots should be challenged. I am persuaded that, because it is not only zoomers who see these challenges, there is always the possibility that some lesser zoomer might be prompted to revisit their prejudices.

I am convinced that the way to convert No voters to Yes voters is to first provoke them to question the assumptions and preconceptions which make them No voters. In the main, unionists are people who have never seriously reflected on the nature of the political union or considered its implications for Scotland. Anything that might prompt such reflection has to benefit the independence cause.

For this reason, I try to abide by a self-imposed ordinance limiting myself to a maximum of three responses to those unionist zoomers. The first questioning the basis of whatever claim it is they are making. The second seeking to refute that claim with facts. The last pointing out their unwillingness to accept the facts. The zoomer will invariably have descended into incoherent abuse almost immediately upon being challenged. But this is all to the good. Bigots can generally be relied upon to condemn themselves by their own words if you just let them speak.

I cannot claim to always adhere strictly to my own rules. But I do try. And this Wings Over Scotland article has made me resolve to try harder in the coming year. But I will decide for myself when I’m done with any particular unionist zoomer. I will decide for myself at what point they cease to serve my purpose.

I should point out that my feelings about Stu Campbell’s personal Twitter block list, as described above, are in no way influenced by the fact that I am on that list. I got over being perplexed about that a long time ago. Helped by the realisation that it IS a personal list. It reflects one person’s attitudes and preference – not to mention their temperament and ‘idiosyncrasies’. I am simply not prepared to embrace somebody else’s personal attitudes and prejudices as my own.

Views: 3852

Many thanks to everyone who has been kind enough to make a donation.
Your generosity is quite extraordinary, and very much appreciated.
All monies received are used in furtherance of the campaign
to restore Scotland’s rightful constitutional status.
Please use the button below or click here.

Please follow and like us 🙂

9 thoughts on “Twitter blocking

      1. MJack

        Just ask to be unblocked, you can contact through the wings website. worked for me, not sure why i got on the list in the first place though.

  1. Neil MacKenzie

    I too will choose who I block.

    Difficult to have a national conversation with fingers in your ears even though most of the blocked ones will never be convinced to independence.

  2. Sandy

    I like you’re three strikes you’re out system, although I’m not on Twitter, I’ll try and adopt it in other online interactions.

    I believe Reverend Stu’s blocking is extremely ‘hair trigger’, but I’d give him the benefit of the doubt – the volume of Unionist trolls he has to deal with would likely try the patience of a saint.

  3. Cadogan Enright

    Rev is missing a trick here, having u on his block list

    I follow you both and others too, you have different strengths and this helps to broaden my mind

  4. Jas

    I’ve noticed your postings on Wings, but I doubt the Rev would ever post something here. Therein lies a subtle difference.

    What I’ve come to dislike about Wings is that it has become something of an in-house clique with the same people talking to each other and if you happen to slightly disagree with their vague ‘consensus’ then you’re quickly drummed out of town for being a ‘troll’. It’s only for ‘local people’ kind of thing!

    So it goes.

    1. Clydebuilt

      Jas. your definitely about the comments section being an echo chamber…..however the Rev. Stu. Does turn out some very good stuff.

      So I’ll not be knocking him……

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Facebook Auto Publish Powered By :