The madness of May

James Kelly has no need to apologise. Nicola Sturgeon has not “modified her position” in any way. To believe that one would have to suppose that she thought there was a serious possibility of her Brexit proposals coming to something. We can be sure that the First Minister knows perfectly well that those proposals would be rejected by the UK Government. although even she may have been slightly taken aback by the disrespectful haste with which Theresa May summarily rejected the Scottish Government’s submission.

This was not a change of direction. It was simply a necessary stage on the journey to #indyref2.

There was never any doubt about whether there would be another independence referendum. It was always going to happen. It was only a question of what events would be the main drivers. If it hadn’t been Brexit, it would have been something else. The British state could be absolutely relied upon to provide grounds for a new vote. Indeed, it could very reasonably be argued that they did so even without the whole Brexit fiasco.

Ever since that fateful day in September 2014, I have been stressing that the Yes movement faced two distinct but related campaigns. It goes without saying that the campaign to restore Scotland’s rightful constitutional status would continue. Notions of the SNP collapsing and the independence movement evaporating were never more than comforting delusions for British nationalist ideologues fearful of an unstoppable wave of democratic dissent. But first there would have to be a campaign to affirm and defend Scotland’s right of self-determination.

It was easy to foresee that the British state would seek to defend and preserve its structures of power, privilege and patronage against what the British establishment regards – with some justification – as the existential threat posed by the SNP and the wider Yes movement. And it was easy to see that the first line of defence would be an attempt to neutralise that threat completely by preventing any further constitutional referendums. The British establishment has long experience of nations seeking to break free of Westminster rule. They know that, ultimately, the British state always loses. Blocking a referendum would be an effective way of putting off that inevitable defeat for a few more years.

Hence the need to ensure that the UK Government didn’t sneak through some legislative or regulatory device which would have the effect of making another independence referendum impossible. That need still exists. The fact that the UK Government has not yet found a way of denying Scotland’s right of self-determination does not mean that they have given up on doing so. A continuing SNP administration at Holyrood and the presence of a massive SNP group at Westminster makes it difficult. But the British establishment is still desperately seeking ways to lock Scotland into the Union – be in no doubt about that.

It may well be argued that the most interesting question arising from all the confusion and uncertainty is, not what Brexit will really mean; or whether Scotland will get a ‘special deal’ (we won’t!); or even when the next independence referendum will be called. The question we should be asking is whether, and how, Theresa May will try to prevent that vote taking place.

For most of the last two years I’ve been fairly dismissive of suggestions that the UK Government and/or the UK Parliament would refuse a section 30 order authorising a referendum. The behaviour of the Westminster elite has prompted me to be considerably less disdainful of such suggestions. The contemptuous manner in which the Scottish Government’s Brexit proposals were rejected now has me thinking that Theresa May could actually be arrogant and stupid enough to try and block the democratic route to independence.

I’m beginning to think Theresa May seriously supposes she can crush Scotland’s independence movement simply by the weight of assumed political authority. I get a distinct sense that she imagines herself to be capable of facing down Nicola Sturgeon and intimidating an entire nation into meekly accepting the denial of a fundamental democratic right.

I hope I’m wrong, but a have a nagging suspicion Theresa May reckons she has some sort of divine power at her side.

This is why we have to get the entire Yes movement solidly behind Nicola Sturgeon. It is very much a battle of wills between these two individuals. We may not like this kind of politics, but it’s the only kind of politics there is within the British political system. A brutish kind of politics that comes down to raw power embodied in and represented by a ‘leader’. Theresa May can draw on all the power of the British state. Nicola Sturgeon must be able to draw on the power of Scotland’s people.

Views: 3744

Many thanks to everyone who has been kind enough to make a donation.
Your generosity is quite extraordinary, and very much appreciated.
All monies received are used in furtherance of the campaign
to restore Scotland’s rightful constitutional status.
Please use the button below or click here.

Please follow and like us 🙂

6 thoughts on “The madness of May

  1. bringiton

    I agree Peter.
    Of course there is always the possibility that May believes the phoney polls which show a majority against independence and the subsequent narrative being spun by HM press.
    The principle of national self determination is not one for Westminster to grant or deny,it is a right recognised internationally and if they want to be seen as even more of a pariah state than they already are,then refusing to recognise the outcome of a democratic decision taken by Scots is the way to go.
    They could,of course,hold their own referendum but that would require the cooperation of Police Scotland and local councils in order to implement it and that May be a much more difficult prospect after the May elections.
    They seem to be hanging their hat on being out of the UK union,the EU union and having to negotiate our way back into the EU one (an almost impossible task apparently).
    As they say at this time of year…Ho Ho Ho..

  2. Dan Huil

    I believe pro-indy voters and campaigners will fully support Nicola Sturgeon. She has shown herself to be intelligent and fair, especially in dealing with Westminster’s brexit mess. The britnat media will of course try to induce the old divide and rule scenario. The people of Scotland, however, have been through all that crap in IndyRef1. The problem for the britnats is that negativity is all they have.

  3. Geejay

    We must be prepared for the British State to throw everything at us, just as they did last time, perhaps even more so, such as legislation to prevent another Indyref, as some Tory suggested a while back. So Peter’s spot on. I also think there will be subterfuge and dirty tricks by the security services. It seems inconceivable to me that they weren’t involved in some way with our first referendum – after all, Scottish Independence is a (security) threat to the British State, as they see it. Hence McPherson’s breaking with all protocol of civil service impartiality, no doubt “encouraged” by Cameron or Osborn. (where are they now?)

    1. Alex Beveridge

      Glad to see someone else mentioning the Security Services, Geejay. As someone who was involved in law and order I can tell you from personal experience that their power is awesome. Police, court, they are swept aside if it suits their nefarious purpose.
      The British State wants to hold Scotland fast, so any means at their disposal will be used to usurp Indyref2.

      1. Geejay

        Cheers, Alex. I always thought it was likely they would be involved, but after reading Ian Cobain’s latest book “The History Thieves….” I am certain they were.

  4. Lochside

    I agree with your analysis Peter. But I believe a critical mistake by the SG has been to focus on the primacy of the Scottish Parliament in the Referendum issue. Prior to 1999 it was always accepted by the SNP and the broader nationalist movement that a majority of nationalist MPs gave us the mandate to assert the right to raise the question of the Act Of Union and its possible demise.

    Despite an almost unanimous presence of Nationalist MPs in the HOC there has not been a hint of our sovereignty, which actually resides with them, not Holyrood, being acted upon to challenge the English suppression of our political and civil rights. The supine acceptance of the Supreme Court’s ( a Blair invention) supremacy over Scots law was and continues to be symptomatic of our impotence politically.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Facebook Auto Publish Powered By :